Table of Contents
Introduction
The Intel RS25DB080 is a second generation SAS-2/SATA III 6Gb/s RAID card featuring two 800MHz processor cores with 1GB cache memory. The card has connections for up to eight SATA III 6Gb/s hard drives via 2 SAS ports and fits into an 8x PCI-E slot. Like most current high-end Intel RAID cards, this card includes support for a battery backup module (AXXRSBBU9) as well as hardware-based keys that are used to unlock advanced features such as SSD Cache with FastPath I/O.
Full product specifications are below:
Driver/Software
Drivers and software are available through Intel's Download Center and includes support for Red Hat, SUSE, Windows 7, Windows Server 2003/2008 and Windows Vista. Windows does not include a native driver for this RAID card, so if an OS is to be installed to a RAID on this controller a driver must be loaded during the install process. Conversely, if the driver is to be loaded into an already present OS, Intel does not include an installation package so the driver must be manually loaded through device manager.
Intel provides both a command line tool as well as the Web Console 2 utility for RAID management. The Web Console 2 is a web-based GUI and from our experience is very reliable and easy to use. It allows for full customization of RAID arrays including RAID creation/deletion, RAID type, drive selection, stripe size, and I/O policies.
Overall, we had no problems locating and installing the drivers and software for this RAID card. RAID configuration similarly went without any problems through the Web Console 2 on our test Windows 7 machine.
Performance
For our performance benchmarking, we used a Core i5 test system and compared the results to four other RAID cards that we have tested. We tested using the most common RAID levels (0,1,5,10), as well as testing single drive performance. For the single drive performance, we also ran benchmarks on the onboard SATA III 6Gb/s controller to give us a baseline against which we could compare the RAID card performance.
Our test system specifications are listed below:
| Testing Hardware | |
| Motherboard | Asus P8P67 Pro |
| RAM | 2x Kingston ValueRAM DDR3-1333 2GB |
| CPU | Intel 2500K Quad Core 3.3GHz |
| RAID Hard Drive(s) | |
| OS | Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit |
*All results are in MB/s
Single Disk
|
Intel RS25DB080 |
LSI 9240-4i |
LSI 9750-4i |
Intel RS2BL040 |
Intel RS2BL080 |
Onboard Intel P67 SATA III |
|
| Seq. Read | 476.8 | 498.5 | 499.1 | 539.0 | 580.7 | 482 |
| Seq. Write | 318.6 | 326.3 | 323.3 | 323.5 | 325.7 | 340.2 |
| Rand. Read 512KB | 336.7 | 336.6 | 151.4 | 391.3 | 495.7 | 335.7 |
| Rand. Write 512KB | 294.4 | 300.1 | 320.3 | 347 | 420.5 | 310.7 |
In single drive performance, the RS2DB080 gives us some disappointing results, having lower benchmark scores than any of our comparison controllers.
RAID 1 (2-disk)
| Intel RS25DB080 | LSI 9240-4i | LSI 9750-4i | Intel RS2BL040 | Intel RS2BL080 | |
| Seq. Read | 500.9 | 490.9 | 576.9 | 560.6 | 579.4 |
| Seq. Write | 322.6 | 70.3 | 303.4 | 325.6 | 326.6 |
| Rand. Read 512KB | 337.2 | 330.3 | 249.6 | 454.1 | 493.2 |
| Rand. Write 512KB | 293.9 | 68.6 | 321.6 | 405.8 | 417.1 |
Once we start testing in a RAID configuration, the RS25DB080 starts to show some better results, although the read performance is lower than we would expect on a high-end RAID card.
RAID 0 (2-disk)
| Intel RS25DB080 | LSI 9240-4i | LSI 9750-4i | Intel RS2BL040 | Intel RS2BL080 | |
| Seq. Read | 851.5 | 776.4 | 708.7 | 998.3 | 1031 |
| Seq. Write | 614.5 | 67.36 | 599.7 | 651.3 | 651.8 |
| Rand. Read 512KB | 513.9 | 424.4 | 241.1 | 637.9 | 681.4 |
| Rand. Write 512KB | 534.0 | 60.6 | 518.2 | 669.4 | 689.4 |
In a 2-disk RAID 0 array, the results are finally better than the comparison LSI RAID cards, although performance is still lower than the other two Intel RAID cards.
RAID 0 (4-disk)
| Intel RS25DB080 | LSI 9240-4i | LSI 9750-4i | Intel RS2BL040 | Intel RS2BL080 | |
| Seq. Read | 1527.8 | 1367 | 1292 | 1267 | 1384 |
| Seq. Write | 938.9 | 128.5 | 1168 | 1307 | 1289 |
| Rand. Read 512KB | 731.4 | 538.4 | 358.8 | 763.6 | 807.5 |
| Rand. Write 512KB | 859.8 | 106.7 | 833.1 | 1190 | 1224 |
In a 4-disk RAID 0 array, we see that the R225DB080 has much better read performance than the other cards, although the write performance is still lacking.
RAID 10 (4-disk)
| Intel RS25DB080 | LSI 9240-4i | LSI 9750-4i | Intel RS2BL040 | Intel RS2BL080 | |
| Seq. Read | 835.6 | 778.2 | 865.9 | 1011 | 1033 |
| Seq. Write | 618.3 | 66.59 | 557.0 | 648.7 | 652.4 |
| Rand. Read 512KB | 512.6 | 424.6 | 328.6 | 628.8 | 656.1 |
| Rand. Write 512KB | 518.8 | 58.3 | 402.1 | 743.8 | 778.7 |
Moving on to a RAID 10 array, we again see a bit of a drop in performance compared to most of the other RAID cards. The results are still better than the LSI 9240-4i, but that card is intended to be used as an entry-level card, so that is not much of an accomplishment.
RAID 5 (4-disk)
| Intel RS25DB080 | LSI 9240-4i | LSI 9750-4i | Intel RS2BL040 | Intel RS2BL080 | |
| Seq. Read | 1488.8 | 1473 | 870.2 | 1241 | 1379 |
| Seq. Write | 221.5 | 51.8 | 711.8 | 973.3 | 980.1 |
| Rand. Read 512KB | 738.6 | 564.5 | 318.3 | 726.5 | 825.0 |
| Rand. Write 512KB | 129.0 | 37.08 | 480.7 | 732.2 | 657.0 |
Finally, in a RAID 5 array we again see great read performance, although the write performance in this RAID type is very low at only 221.5 MB/s
Overall, we are a bit disappointed with the performance of this RAID card. In a few configurations (4-disk RAID 0 and 5) this card had the best read performance, but across the board the write speeds were much lower than we would like to see. Especially considering that the RS25DB080 is more expensive than the Intel RS2BL080, which is also an eight port RAID card, we would expect to see much better performance results.
Conclusion
In terms of usability, this RAID card works perfectly. But that is also true of the other similar Intel RAID cards on the market – namely the Intel RS2BL040 and RS2BL080 – as they both use the exact same management software. The RS25DB080 however does have better specs than the RS2BL080 as it has an additional 512MB of cache and a dual core processor. Just looking at our benchmarks however, this card showed worse performance than the other two Intel cards almost across the board. Except in specific applications where the extra 512MB of cache and dual core processor would be useful, we do not see any reason to use the more expensive RS25DB080 when the already-proven RS2BL080 has similar or better performance.
As a custom system builder, Puget Systems strives to find the best possible components for each of our computers. In the case of this RAID card, it did not measure up to our performance standards and we will not be including it in our product line. However, this type of testing is what helps us ensure that every computer we sell is reliable, powerful and top of the line. If you have any questions about our testing procedures, or the components we use in our computers, feel free to email us at [email protected]